AEO WRANGLER B2B SOFTWARE INDEX

AEC Visualization Visibility Index

Which visualization vendors AI answer engines actually name when architects, developers, and visualization studios ask what to buy

126 prompts · 6 buyer personas · ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Copilot · 504 responses · Run September 2026

Download the full report (PDF, 32 pages)

Core visualization vendors · 126 prompts · Run September 2026
RankVendorScoreChatGPTGeminiAI ModeCopilotPromptsPersonas
1Chaos77.083.382.581.760.31206 / 6
2Epic Games64.164.373.863.554.81056 / 6
3D5 (Dimension 5)46.262.742.142.138.1896 / 6
4Lumion (Act-3D)28.053.212.722.223.8736 / 6
5Blender Foundation8.74.08.715.17.1265 / 6
6Autodesk8.77.97.98.710.3205 / 6
7LookX8.36.310.38.77.9224 / 6
8Maxon5.84.87.15.65.6174 / 6
9Arkio5.47.17.12.44.8111 / 6
10Midjourney5.24.87.17.11.6163 / 6
11Shapespark5.05.67.13.24.092 / 6
12Unity Technologies4.81.63.28.75.6165 / 6
13OTOY4.04.07.93.20.8153 / 6
14Gendo3.61.64.07.11.6113 / 6
15Stability AI3.21.64.84.81.691 / 6
16Krea3.02.44.84.00.8134 / 6
17SENTIO3.03.22.43.23.281 / 6
18ArchiVinci2.24.00.04.00.8103 / 6
19Vizcom2.00.86.30.00.882 / 6
Four vendors, then a cliff. The gap between fourth place and fifth is 19.3 points, and no vendor below fourth reaches 16 percent coverage on any engine. Chaos leads on breadth, with five products above the inclusion floor. Lumion's fourth place rests on ChatGPT, where it is named four times as often as on Gemini.
All figures are the percentage of prompts naming each vendor or product. Vendor tables combine a company's products, so Chaos counts once whether an answer names Enscape, V-Ray, or both. The product table counts each product separately. This measures AI visibility, not product quality or market share.
KEY FINDINGS

What the data shows

Five findings from 504 responses, 247 products named, and 3,282 source citations.

Chaos leads, but four vendors dominate the answer

Chaos is named in 120 of the 126 prompts and scores 77.0 on equal engine weight. Epic Games follows at 64.1, D5 at 46.2, and Lumion at 28.0. Fifth place goes to Blender Foundation at 8.7, a gap of 19.3 points, and no vendor below fourth reaches 16 percent coverage on any engine. Together the top four take 66.6 percent of all visualization vendor mentions. Chaos holds first through breadth: five of its products clear the inclusion floor, covering concept work, design iteration, and production rendering.

The four engines are not describing the same market

Lumion is named in 53.2 percent of ChatGPT prompts and 12.7 percent of Gemini prompts. Unreal Engine runs the other way, at 20.6 percent on ChatGPT against 46.8 percent on Gemini. D5 Render reaches 62.7 percent on ChatGPT, its best figure anywhere, and lands between 38 and 43 percent on the other three. Copilot is the narrowest of the four, with 37 of its answers naming one visualization product or none at all. A buyer's shortlist depends heavily on which assistant they happen to open.

Visibility comes from two separate mechanisms

For every vendor mention we checked whether the same answer cited that vendor's own website. Products released before 2015 are supported that way in 44.6 percent of their mentions, against 58.7 to 60.9 percent for everything newer. On Google's two engines the gap widens to 18.9 percent against 32.5 to 34.1 percent. Twinmotion and Unreal Engine are named on Gemini and AI Mode almost entirely on reputation, with their vendor's site behind 7 and 6 percent of those mentions. A long-established vendor can do very little AEO work and still rank, because the engines remember it. A newer product has to be found, which puts its visibility in the hands of content it publishes.

Buyer situation changes the answer more than anything else

The six personas produce six different leaderboards. Concept exploration is the sharpest break: an independent AI-era newcomer appears in 19 of its 21 prompts, against 18 of the 105 prompts across the other five personas combined. LookX, launched in 2023, ranks second there, ahead of D5, Epic, and Lumion, and six of the top ten are AI image vendors. Immersive work is a separate market again, where Arkio takes all 11 of its appearances in the study. Lumion sits fourth overall and ninth in concept exploration.

The design tool sets the frame

Revit is the most-named product in a visualization study at 64.3, and not one prompt mentions it. Rhino, SketchUp, and Archicad also outrank several core renderers. Design authoring tools take 27.6 percent of all product mentions against 43.6 percent for core visualization. The engines organize visualization answers around the host application, so "which renderer works inside Revit" is the frame a vendor competes inside. Thirteen prompts describe a BIM model without naming the software, and Revit was named in response to all thirteen.

FAQ

Where does my company rank?

The tables above carry every ranked vendor. Core visualization shows all 19, including adjacent shows the 20 most-named products of any category, and the persona view shows the top six in each of the six buyer situations. A vendor's position often differs between those views, which is usually the most useful thing to know: Autodesk ranks sixth overall and third in immersive and interactive, and LookX ranks seventh overall and second in concept exploration. If your company is not in any table, it was named in fewer than 8 of the 126 prompts, and the full report lists everything below that floor.

Why is my company missing entirely?

Products named in fewer than 8 of the 126 prompts are not ranked, because at that volume the difference between two appearances and one is noise rather than a competitive gap. Seventy-four further visualization products cleared at least one mention and fell below that floor, and they are listed in the full report. If a product was never named at all, that is the finding rather than an omission: 247 products were named across 504 responses, so the engines were not short of names to offer.

How can a vendor I have never heard of rank ahead of one I have?

Because this measures AI visibility, not market position. Autodesk sells the most-named product in the entire study, Revit, and ranks sixth among visualization vendors at 8.7. Arkio, a VR startup most of the industry could not name, ranks ninth, and Shapespark eleventh, both ahead of Unity. Visibility is earned question by question, so a vendor can be widely deployed and rarely named, and a small vendor with strong published content can be named often.

Why are Revit and SketchUp in a visualization ranking?

Because the engines put them there. The extended table reports everything named in response to visualization questions, and design authoring tools took 27.6 percent of all product mentions against 43.6 percent for core visualization. Revit is the most-named product in the study and no prompt mentions it by name. The core table applies a test that excludes tools whose job is authoring the model, which is why Revit appears in one table and not the other.

Why do the persona scores look so much higher than the overall scores?

Persona scores are out of 21 prompts rather than 126, so they run higher by construction. Chaos scoring 88.1 in developer and real estate marketing against 77.0 overall is not contradicting itself. Compare persona scores against each other, and overall scores against each other, but not across the two.

Why are Enscape, V-Ray, Corona, and Veras all counted as Chaos?

Where one vendor sells more than one product inside the category, the products count as a single entry, because a buyer choosing between vendors is not choosing between two Chaos products. This affects Chaos, Epic Games, D5, Autodesk, and Lumion. Combined figures are the union of prompts naming any of the products rather than the sum of them. Acquired products roll up to the current owner, so Veras counts as Chaos from its February 2025 acquisition and IrisVR Prospect and The Wild count as Autodesk. Per-product figures are in the full report.

Why is Unreal Engine's score lower than I expected?

Twinmotion is built on Unreal Engine, and many answers mention Unreal only to describe what powers Twinmotion, as in "powered by Unreal Engine 5." Those mentions are counted for Twinmotion. Unreal named as a product in its own right, an export target, or a step in a pipeline still counts as Unreal. Without that rule a single answer about Twinmotion would score twice for Epic.

Working through this for your own company?

Get in Touch →